Mesothelioma

Dr. Rice or Senator Hilary, Who do you think would make a better presidential candidate?

Public Comments

1. Taking the lesser of 2 evils, Hilary. Let Rice go do the NFL commissioners job.
2. Dr. Rice. (If that Condi v. Hillary turns out to be the title card for the next election, it might be a good time to get into the political ad business.)
3. Condi, Clinton is way too far left.
4. Neither. They both supported this mess in Iraq and both are capable of mendacity, however Condasleeza is more of a liar and has done more harm.
5. Hillary Clinton--she's bright, caring, is responsive & advocates well for her constituents. Rice certainly is bright and articulate, but it has been difficult for me to see her responsive & advocacy side for the American public. I believe she's great as an idea generator and someone "loyal to a cause", but I think Hillary is much better rounded. That's what the "Leader of the Free World" needs to be.
6. A better candidate? Rice. Hillary has too many skeletons and has too many inconsistancies. Rice has a well-rounded academic background and is very popular with both the core conservatives and moderates alike...Hillary is going to have a lot of problems holding the moderates in place. I predict Hillary will not make the 2008 Presidential ticket, but Condi will as a VP candidate.
7. Ms. Clinton already has the experience. She came out on top of her husbands sex scandal looking like a sweet and innocent victim, and then turned around and stormed the senate. Hillary has the minority vote, the feminist vote, the aclu vote, and the "i'm not a republican" vote. Condi does not have the "America's sweetheart" history that the Hillinator has. Hillary has done a good job of knowing how to deal publicly with isuues and come out appearing to be a caring advocate of the people. If the dreaded day came that they were the candidates, Hillary would win.
8. I say Hillary 100%. She already has experience. Somebody had to run the show for Clinton.