Mesothelioma - Why Does Condoleeza Rice Say Twice on CSPAN "to Spread Democracy, We Must Impose tyranny"?

Why Does Condoleeza Rice Say Twice on CSPAN "to Spread Democracy, We Must Impose tyranny"?

November 6, 2006 C-SPAN Condoleeza Rice says on TWO different occasions in this short video..."I think we should impose tyranny" She is speaking of Iraq. Did she mean it? Was it a mistake? The only other conclusion is that the Secretary of State doesn't know what tyranny means. Right? Dr. Rice has doctorates from SEVEN major Universities. Don't believe it? See it with your own two eyes http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1395162567 "I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson first United States Secretary of State 1. arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority. 2. the government or rule of a tyrant or absolute ruler. 3. oppressive or unjustly severe government 5. undue severity or harshness. Synonyms 1. despotism, absolutism, dictatorship. The first time she says it.....Alright, fine. The second time she says it.....thats a little scary. PLEASE watch the video "stephanie..." I thought she might be meaning to say "oppose" instead of "impose", too. But then if thats the case, why would she say we need to oppose democracy. She used the same word for both democracy and tyranny.

Public Comments

Why? Guess you need to ask her that question, eh?
Condoleeza Rice is a Fascist idiot like her boss She got us into this when she should have told Bush he was wrong. She is a sell-out of the first order.
ummmmm ........ you deposed a tyrant to impose tyranny ........... I'M GLAD 2865 AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND 150000 CIVILIANS LOST THEIR LIVES FOR THIS!
Huh...that is interesting. It doesnt even sound like you mixed the words up. I thought maybe she meant to say oppose tyranny, but yep she clearly did not say that. That is a strange one. EDIT: This administration has proven time and time again they have no care for anything but imposing their own plan on people whether they like it or not. You can just put this video in the file of what they have done wrong.
Which one has to be imposed? democracy or tyranny She never said 'we' imposed tyranny only that there is no need for imposing democracy.. I guess it's over your head. edit: Ruth says it exactly.
Oh, she sure meant it. The NWO, aka Bilderberg Group has seemly been attempting to bring the world under one fold in a kind of American styled democracy. The so called "Islamo fascists" and or so called renegade regimes are trying to stay out of this fold, quite bravely, especially Chavez, the "bravest man on the planet". Due to the resistance of these groups to adopt the American style democracy, the NWO is resorting to force to "stabilize" the world. Yes you may choose Democrat, Republican, whatever. Divide and conquer, keep 'em divided so no other voice can interfere. Our only hope is for the liberal and conservative populous to unite and stop this. My advice, hunker down and prepare yourself and families to fight for freedom. Also in the short-term get ready for possible war in Iran and $150 dollars a barrel. May god help us all.
I heard her say that democracy could not be imposed but that you would have to impose tyranny. It was a clear conceptual contrast. She is saying she has a problem using the term impose for democracy, because it is tyranny which must be imposed (as opposed to chosen). And I agree with you that she could have used less subtlety. Maybe she was preaching to the choir? I understood her perfectly. I hope that gives you at least a modicum of comfort tonight. Listen again.
What she said was "oppose" tyranny, we must oppose tyranny. Funny how just a few letters give a completely different meaning. Those are tyrannical regimes and she was talking about giving the people there a choice. Comparatively how can you say that what the US does there is more tyrannical to what they would do to their own people. Give it a rest.
1) she never said that. 2) myspace isn't a credible source.
SHe is someone who is a yes woman for the admistration, she sold out her stands for civil rights long ago when Bush gave her a call. Thats Bush's platform tyrany for demoracy!